
There will be audiences to keep, and rolling thunder to bear upon the day of your safe arrival in Taos.
Inside of the heads of mankind is ripe confused mango meat. It is unpicked and it will be unkind.
Anyone who thinks this is not serious business will be very upset to find out that all their angst has been catalogued, for future generations to quail at.
Meanwhile...
Can one really understand mathematics by exploring the conceptual schemas that it hangs upon? In 'Where Mathematics Comes From' are some interesting, if presumptuous, arguments that at least put some mathematical concepts into an understandable framework.
Who hasn't struggled over the fact that 0.99999999... sometimes equals 1 and sometimes is less than 1? Who hasn't been confused about Transfinite numbers? Perhaps the author has done something more than just delineate these abstract objects into a conceptual framework. Maybe he has given us an invaluable tool to continue thinking about mathematics and eventually physics and science as conceptual constructs.
Is this any better?